Encompassing lesson about the Madden from Mya's blog

If he was looking at  Mut 24 coins  the rear-view view mirror... the driver was not paying attention.

This is an all-encompassing lesson about the Madden NFL 24 Draft. Don't put all your eggs into one basket. It's quite easy for something to go wrong for a single player. Despite his talent, injuries and politics turned the best beginning to the Washington career into an unimaginable nightmare. Future prospects for any player is such that it's best off diversifying your investments, because it's harder for things to go wrong with the entire team of players. The best way to get good players from the draft isn't having the best pick. The goal is to have the highest number of choices, and the greatest chances to pick players who won't go under.

In any case, when Washington made a trade for the no. 2 selection, it was getting a quarterback that everyone was confident would do well.

Nobody in this year's class is a candidate for that. The Rams have claimed to want the services of a quarterback but pretty much everybody agrees that a quarterback's not the most desirable player to be picked in this year's draft, and certainly not among one of the three top players. Even if picking a quarterback, nobody is really a standout among the others: Draft experts tend to be pretty evenly divided on what the top quarterback of the year will be Wentz or Jared Goff.

There was debate over Griffin and Andrew Luck in 2012. and there was debate about Jameis Winston, or Marcus Mariota last year, however, this one is a completely different debate. The two were highly anticipated prospects competing to be the top. This is a crop of prospects with potential, and no one knows which has the greatest potential to become great.

Last week, Bill Barnwell of ESPN detailed how in the lottery-like draft "the smartest strategy is simply to get many more lottery tickets." The RG3 trade was possibly one of the most effective examples of this of all time, yet the winners of the trade seem to be ignorant of that fact. Maybe it will work out but the Rams should know better.

The Chargers could trade Philip Rivers, but they'd likely screw it up, too.

LaDainian Tomlinson says the Chargers should sell Philip Rivers. The Chargers are in rebuilding mode and should consider trading Philip Rivers instead of ruin his entire career. Is that realistic?

It's all very sensible at first glance. The Chargers are, again absolutely a disaster, having lost three games in agonizing way after blowing leads in the fourth quarter. Rivers isn't part of the problem. He's getting 68.8% of passes. He averages 7.8 yards per effort, has 1.110 yards, seven touchdowns, and only one interception.

The Chargers signed Rivers to a four-year extension of $83 million in the year, however his structure in the contract isn't prohibitive for trading him. The cap isn't set to exceed $22 million until the end of the year, so it's very easy for teams to be able to get rid of it after the year 2018.

Then again, the Chargers really have  mut 24 coins for sale  a need for every bit of support they are able to get ... which they're lacking after going through so many losses lately including the Bosa holdout and that entire threatening fans to leave the team by relocation. If they could get rid of Mike McCoy and make the right kind of moves in the offseasonperiod, they could be competitive in the near future, sooner than you imagine. But that's admittedly a huge leap of faith for the team that hasn't produced anything particularly impressive, in the field or off.