360 degree feedback from sansara smith's blog

If you have spent any time analysing 360 degree feedback performance dimensions in the last few days, you’ve arguably observed how hard to understand it can be.

For 360 degree instruments that do include ratings of importance in a job or organization, there has been concern that nothing much was known about the validity of the importance data. That is, although all instruments that meet high-quality standards for instrument development' contain scales on which the relationship to effectiveness is known, few have tested the assumption that responses to "importance" questions produce useful information. Waiting for 360 degree reviewers to complete their questionnaires can take some time. Be sure to set deadlines upfront and send automated reminders to raters who have not yet completed their tasks or whose deadlines are approaching. There are a number of ways to reach out to customers and involve them in a 360-degree feedback process. In the design phase of a program, input from key customers can be helpful. Input might include customers' ideas about the criteria that they feel ought to be part of the process, the expectations they have of employees or managers with whom they come in contact, and the areas in which they would like to provide feedback. They may also want to help shape the process that will be used to gather the feedback and the mechanisms that will be used to solicit their involvement. 360 degree feedbackcan elicit emotions and often does – before, during and after. For everyone, participants and reviewers alike. The trouble with this is that the emotions are usually not conducive for learning. Real development does not happen in moments of fear and upset. Learning does not take place when you are anxious or frustrated. Creativity has no place when you are worried. 360 degree feedbackis harder than a personality profile feedback as the data is harsher than a self-review style perspective. It is harder than a personal coaching session as it is not just the individual’s agenda and perspective on the table. It is harder than a typical wellbeing counselling session as there is an immediacy in facing the data and there is a reintegration back to the role required. It is perhaps most akin to post-traumatic stress counselling and this requires very high-level skills. The development process itself, of which the 360-degree feedback survey is a part, has a rationale that can be quickly explained and understood by anyone walking up to the 360-degree feedback sponsor in the hall and saying, "Why do I have to do this?" Drawing from the discussion in the body of the chapter, possible answers include, "We have no bench strength," "We are losing some of our best people," "We are changing our production processes," "We are losing our creative edge and our market share."



The questions in the 360 degree process need to be well thought out, well-executed and tailored to your organisation, it takes time to develop in order to be effective. If this process isn’t clear, well-communicated or rushed, you can risk causing tension among teams. 360-degree feedback criteria may vary based on the relationship between the reviewer and the reviewee. For example, employees may review their managers on competencies related to leadership and people management. Criteria may also vary depending on the nature of the job of the reviewee. For example, a software developer may be reviewed in the technical skills required of someone in their seniority level. There are some critical aspects of your organisation that you can clearly see could do with improvement. You listen to people, you can see the metrics, you are immersed in the people aspects of the organisation and you know that there are behaviours going on that are destructive. There are things being done and said that are not helping the general cause and performance, there are dynamics at play that are dysfunctional. If none of this is true then there are certainly things that could be done better. For the organization, customer involvement in the 360-degree feedback process, especially at the level of the individual service provider, offers several significant advantages. Direct customer feedback helps the organization determine if strategic alignment of performance has been achieved throughout all levels of the organization. Also, customer input and feedback help to ensure that the organization continues to target its efforts at processes the customer finds value-added. Keeping up with the latest developments regarding what is 360 degree feedback is a pre-cursor to Increased employee motivation and building the link between performance and rewards.

360-Degree InstrumentsInternally developed multisource assessment processes often encourage managers to solicit input from others, using any means available. Some managers simply talk to others; some ask for specific information. A surprisingly common response is to call a group meeting to discuss feedback about a particular person. These open sessions often lead to little real information and can cause very hard feelings. Many people have issues with traditional performance reviews because they feel they are ineffective. The traditional review opens the door to bias and provides a narrow view of overall performance, especially when your organization operates in a remote capacity. 360-degree feedback creates a complete view of employee performance, leading to more accurate and fair reviews. Important employee skills like leadership, time management, team management, communication management etc. can be developed through 360 degree feedback. Similarly, a feedback from vendors & suppliers, known as 540 degree feedback is also used by companies. The impact of 360-degree feedback will be limited if the process ends as soon as the manager receives his or her feedback report. Research on the impact of 360-degree instruments has shown that in order for managers to use the information to enhance their development as leaders or to improve their performance, they need support. The more support they receive, in terms of variety and quantity, the more likely they are to implement change as a result of feedback. Managers and employees want pay and promotion decisions to be fair. Research across large sets of employee groups indicate that users perceive 360 degree feedbackto be more fair than single-rate processes. When these decisions occur in a culture where rewards are based on performance or contribution rather than on seniority or politics, they will be fair. Analysis and decision making become easier when an understanding of 360 degree feedback is woven into the organisational fabric.

Collecting 360-degree feedback throughout the year can help prepare for performance reviews. When an employee receives feedback year-round, they can incorporate it more quickly. With ongoing 360-degree feedback, employees can reflect on their year during performance review time. Plus, managers have a resource to recall what employees worked on throughout the year and see how they progressed. Despite technological leaps in data collection and reporting, introducing a new kind of feedback system can be labor-intensive for any organization. But if you have the basics right and choose the right feedback tool, the success rate of the new system tends to get higher. Clear communication is arguably a key factor in the 360 degree process. Make sure the messaging is very clear around what the 360 process is for, how data will be used, who will see it and how the participants benefit from taking part. The key thing to do with negative data in a 360 degree feedbacksession is to make sure the participants keep the doors open and their mind open to what it might mean. Usually the truly upsetting conclusions are only answered in proper dialogue in real life, not looking at a personal 360 degree feedbackreport. Fundamental to 360 degree feedbackis the objective of increasing self-awareness, which is one of the key objectives of coaching, counselling and career development activities. Supporting the big vision encompassing 360 degree feedback system will lead to untold career development initiatives.

Use Of 360-Degree Feedback TodayAn employee's supervisor-only performance appraisal may not truly reflect the individual's actual job performance. High-performing employees may receive poor appraisals that limit their opportunity for rewards such as pay increases and promotions due to the idiosyncrasies of the supervisor. Most people can relate examples of employees who have had their career lives shattered by a single, possibly biased, supervisor. Because a 360 survey is often not seen as something that requires our immediate attention, it is often delayed into oblivion. A good way to solve this is to set a clear deadline for submission. This works well when it is mandatory to complete the survey. Alternatively, rewarding people for completing the survey could also be very effective. This reward could be any small gadget that stimulates people to participate just to get it! During 360-degree feedback, there is arguably a higher concentration on negative character traits. You should highlight any weak points; but keep an overall focus on strengths, as this is the best way to improve and develop skills. Safeguard reports, created by well-designed software, can provide in-depth information about the process. Safeguards indicate immediately if a 360 degree feedbackproject is not effective because respondent behaviors show what people thought about the process. For example, in a successful project, the item (survey question) response rate is highgreater than 85 percentwhich means most people responded to most items. When users do not support a multisource process, response rates will be low. 360 degree feedbackis best designed as a co-creation with your key stakeholders and in the light of the bigger and most inspiring strategic initiatives. You can work with others and consult fully and you can allow the content to emerge in their language. In the meantime you can hold the integrity of the process, the structure and robustness of the frameworks and the survey itself. You can fulfil a commitment to providing a valid, robust and meaningful instrument. Making sense of 360 appraisal eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.

A 360 degree feedbackprogramme is not an excuse for employees to start bad mouthing their colleagues or to point out everyone’s weaknesses. It’s a tool for developing and improving the performance of your employees. As such, the system should be developed by experts, who understand the best way to communicate questions for those providing feedback. When co-workers evaluate each other as part of the 360 degree process, they internalize the same organizational standards. For example, a manager can rate a peer with items that are related to customer service. By evaluating the peer on these specific dimensions, the manager will perceive that the organization is serious about customer service. Also, when managers receive feedback on the dimensions, they recognize that these are the behaviors that the organization values and wants to see enhanced. The 360 degree performance appraisal system is an advanced kind of appraisal that is used by many organizations where the performance of employees is judged using the review of around 7 to 12 people. These people are working with the employee and they share some of their work environment. After the 360 degree survey, leaders get detailed reports about how others have observed them on the job. They can then use the data to fuel their development, focusing on key strengths and weaknesses. The 360 will give this technicolour, granular “scan” of perspectives. It will be a key diagnostic in a programme. It will be hugely interesting in this setting – not a thing to be managed and survived in itself. How much easier is that? Developing the leadership pipeline with regard to 360 feedback software helps clarify key organisational messages.

Diversity ManagementIn order to ensure that the 360 degree feedbackproviders will have a balanced perspective, there should be no sample bias, wherein only those who have positive (or negative) things to say are invited to participate. As far as process is concerned, it’s generally best to have coachees draft the initial list, and then run it by their boss, and possibly even HR, for refinement and approval. Like any other major change, senior leadership support accelerates the adoption of the 360 degree feedbackprocess. The leadership team may be the first or an early group to receive behavior feedback. Many organizations pilot a 360 degree feedbackproject with a group of fifty to one hundred participants who are not part of the top management group. After the pilot test, the communications, training, and process actions can be refined to fit the needs of employees and management better. Multi-rater surveys, such as the 360 degree review, offer individuals and organizations a unique opportunity for holistic, advanced feedback. To capitalize on the opportunity, the organization must clearly define the objectives, train the raters, and design a process that encourages open discussion. Therefore, one must check for feedback readiness, be clear about the objectives, and systematically initiate the process. Get further particulars appertaining to 360 degree feedback performance dimensions in this Wikipedia link.

Related Articles:Additional Findings About 360-Degree feedback instruments
Supplementary Findings On 360 degree assessment initiatives
Background Insight On 360-Degree appraisal projects
More Findings On 360 degree appraisal processes
Additional Findings On 360 degree feedback expectations
More Findings About 360 degree evaluation instruments
Extra Findings On 360 degree appraisal initiatives